<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steven E. Jones to retire</title>
	<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/10/steven-e-jones-to-retire/</link>
	<description>Taking on Loose Change, 9/11 truth, and 9/11 conspiracy theories</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/10/steven-e-jones-to-retire/#comment-10590</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/10/steven-e-jones-to-retire/#comment-10590</guid>
		<description>I was interested in debunking the 9-11 concerned, and read your interesting article by Brent Blanchard (Aug. 8, 2006) on the implosionworld.com site and was interested in a comment made by the authors.

It is stated that no part or the building ever moved above or below the impact zone until the elements within the impact zone begin to collapse.  I was blown away by this comment since in fact I see two distinct things happen nearly a full second before the significant collapse.  Specifically I notice the large television tower fall nearly 15 feet against the roof line before the building itself falls, and a large plume of dust/smoke issues out of a hole near the roof edge and at the same time, dut puffs out the lower windows were the main collapse seems to start from a second later.  I also noticed in a row of windows, where debri had been sticking out since the jetliner collision, seems to be pulled back into the building a second before the main collapse.

Could you please explain what was happening that could cause this.  Was the severely damaged 'core' collapsing first, pulling the rest of the building down with it?  I would appreciate any comment on this, as the conspiracy theorist I talk to seem to think this is the beginning of the demolition run, mainly the core was the significant demolition target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interested in debunking the 9-11 concerned, and read your interesting article by Brent Blanchard (Aug. 8, 2006) on the implosionworld.com site and was interested in a comment made by the authors.</p>
<p>It is stated that no part or the building ever moved above or below the impact zone until the elements within the impact zone begin to collapse.  I was blown away by this comment since in fact I see two distinct things happen nearly a full second before the significant collapse.  Specifically I notice the large television tower fall nearly 15 feet against the roof line before the building itself falls, and a large plume of dust/smoke issues out of a hole near the roof edge and at the same time, dut puffs out the lower windows were the main collapse seems to start from a second later.  I also noticed in a row of windows, where debri had been sticking out since the jetliner collision, seems to be pulled back into the building a second before the main collapse.</p>
<p>Could you please explain what was happening that could cause this.  Was the severely damaged &#8216;core&#8217; collapsing first, pulling the rest of the building down with it?  I would appreciate any comment on this, as the conspiracy theorist I talk to seem to think this is the beginning of the demolition run, mainly the core was the significant demolition target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol wolman</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/10/steven-e-jones-to-retire/#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>carol wolman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/10/steven-e-jones-to-retire/#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>If we examine what Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld were doing on 9-11, one must conclude that they were all part of a plot to stage a "false flag" operation, to lay the groundwork for the rest of their evil plans.  If 3000 people had to die,- oh well, you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs.  
 
Bush, the pResident,  was not surprised.  So he must have had prior knowledge. The target #1 of a true terrorist attack, was sitting unprotected in an elementary school classroom, reading "My pet goat", and went on doing that for 7 minutes after being told "we're under attack". Evidently the Secret Service was not worried about his safety, so they knew it wasn't an enemy attack.  Evidently "The Decider" didn't feel the need to take command, get on the phone to NORAD and assess the situation, scramble fighter jets to intercept the other 3 planes, which were quickly identified as being off course...  The Commander-in-Chief was either derelict in his duty or in on the plot.  Either way, he should be impeached.
 
Dick Cheney, the Vice pResident, was in the Situation Room of the White House, monitoring a CIA simulation of planes crashing into buildings "by a bizarre coincidence".  The Pentagon was also conducting several live-fly hijacking exercises that day, so the sky was full of pilots playing war games.  Probably Cheney was orchestrating all of these plus the four planes that were part of the 9-11 "attack".  Certainly Cheney, sitting in the Situation Room, was in a position to see the hijackers and intervene, and didn't.  So he's either derelict in his duty, or the mastermind.  Certainly impeachable, either way. 
 
Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, was sitting in his office in the Pentagon, on the side away from the "attack", which occurred AFTER both towers were hit. When the Pentagon was struck, he sauntered out, and claimed that he had no idea what was going on!  No one called the Secretary of Defense?  Especially since on June 1, 2001, just 3 months earlier, he had had the rules about scrambling fighter jets changed, in such a way that no interceptions could take place without HIS PERSONAL APPROVAL!  And no one tried to reach him?  Or he was unreachable?  Either he was derelict or part of the plot.  Either way, it's criminal.
 
All three of these men were responsible for defending the US from enemy attack, and utterly failed to do so.  In the Navy, a captain who loses a ship is automatically court-martialled.  Shouldn't these three men be subjected to a military tribunal, to account for losing three buildings, 3000 lives, and part of the Pentagon?  For their failure to take appropriate countermeasures?
 
How likely is it that all three of these key people were derelict?  Isn't it much more likely that they were conspiring together?  Why won't our elected Representatives in Congress IMPEACH THEM?
 
In the name of the God of truth,
 
Carol Wolman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we examine what Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld were doing on 9-11, one must conclude that they were all part of a plot to stage a &#8220;false flag&#8221; operation, to lay the groundwork for the rest of their evil plans.  If 3000 people had to die,- oh well, you can&#8217;t make an omelet without breaking eggs.  </p>
<p>Bush, the pResident,  was not surprised.  So he must have had prior knowledge. The target #1 of a true terrorist attack, was sitting unprotected in an elementary school classroom, reading &#8220;My pet goat&#8221;, and went on doing that for 7 minutes after being told &#8220;we&#8217;re under attack&#8221;. Evidently the Secret Service was not worried about his safety, so they knew it wasn&#8217;t an enemy attack.  Evidently &#8220;The Decider&#8221; didn&#8217;t feel the need to take command, get on the phone to NORAD and assess the situation, scramble fighter jets to intercept the other 3 planes, which were quickly identified as being off course&#8230;  The Commander-in-Chief was either derelict in his duty or in on the plot.  Either way, he should be impeached.</p>
<p>Dick Cheney, the Vice pResident, was in the Situation Room of the White House, monitoring a CIA simulation of planes crashing into buildings &#8220;by a bizarre coincidence&#8221;.  The Pentagon was also conducting several live-fly hijacking exercises that day, so the sky was full of pilots playing war games.  Probably Cheney was orchestrating all of these plus the four planes that were part of the 9-11 &#8220;attack&#8221;.  Certainly Cheney, sitting in the Situation Room, was in a position to see the hijackers and intervene, and didn&#8217;t.  So he&#8217;s either derelict in his duty, or the mastermind.  Certainly impeachable, either way. </p>
<p>Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, was sitting in his office in the Pentagon, on the side away from the &#8220;attack&#8221;, which occurred AFTER both towers were hit. When the Pentagon was struck, he sauntered out, and claimed that he had no idea what was going on!  No one called the Secretary of Defense?  Especially since on June 1, 2001, just 3 months earlier, he had had the rules about scrambling fighter jets changed, in such a way that no interceptions could take place without HIS PERSONAL APPROVAL!  And no one tried to reach him?  Or he was unreachable?  Either he was derelict or part of the plot.  Either way, it&#8217;s criminal.</p>
<p>All three of these men were responsible for defending the US from enemy attack, and utterly failed to do so.  In the Navy, a captain who loses a ship is automatically court-martialled.  Shouldn&#8217;t these three men be subjected to a military tribunal, to account for losing three buildings, 3000 lives, and part of the Pentagon?  For their failure to take appropriate countermeasures?</p>
<p>How likely is it that all three of these key people were derelict?  Isn&#8217;t it much more likely that they were conspiring together?  Why won&#8217;t our elected Representatives in Congress IMPEACH THEM?</p>
<p>In the name of the God of truth,</p>
<p>Carol Wolman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truth911.net</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/10/steven-e-jones-to-retire/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>truth911.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/10/steven-e-jones-to-retire/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>You guys can't debunk the Norman Mineta Testimony.  No one has ever even attempted to publish any sort of explanation to comment on  Mineta's testimony and Clarke's book.  try and debunk my work, you wont be able too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys can&#8217;t debunk the Norman Mineta Testimony.  No one has ever even attempted to publish any sort of explanation to comment on  Mineta&#8217;s testimony and Clarke&#8217;s book.  try and debunk my work, you wont be able too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
