<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FBI releases Citgo security video</title>
	<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/</link>
	<description>Taking on Loose Change, 9/11 truth, and 9/11 conspiracy theories</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ken D. Webber</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-15602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken D. Webber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-15602</guid>
		<description>Your "debunking" website if full of hogwash.  There is a movie called Pentacon in which four eyewitnesses state the plane was on the NORTH side of the Citgo station, and one stating the plane pulled up.  That means that the downed light poles were staged as was the taxi cab, which amazingly, had a windshield supposedly broken from a light pole but not a SCRATCH to the hood of the car.  TWO of the witnesses who SAW the plane were cops.  What you would have us believe is that four different eyewitnesses, two of which are policemen, are conspiring and lying.  I also suppose you call ALL the eyewitnesses to the secondary explosions and explosions in the basements liars too?  And hot spots after are???  Get a clue loser.  The facts DEBUNK your debunking.  911 WAS an inside job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;debunking&#8221; website if full of hogwash.  There is a movie called Pentacon in which four eyewitnesses state the plane was on the NORTH side of the Citgo station, and one stating the plane pulled up.  That means that the downed light poles were staged as was the taxi cab, which amazingly, had a windshield supposedly broken from a light pole but not a SCRATCH to the hood of the car.  TWO of the witnesses who SAW the plane were cops.  What you would have us believe is that four different eyewitnesses, two of which are policemen, are conspiring and lying.  I also suppose you call ALL the eyewitnesses to the secondary explosions and explosions in the basements liars too?  And hot spots after are???  Get a clue loser.  The facts DEBUNK your debunking.  911 WAS an inside job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-15102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 02:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-15102</guid>
		<description>Tim Wrote -- "How does a jet hit 80 floors up and cause total destruction to the sub-floors and lobby."

Come on Tim, Buddy. Think about what you just said. Did you forget to mention that each building collapsed upon itself? 110 floors of heavy steal and concrete literally 500,000 tons falling straight down! I'm no expert on "total destruction" but, I'm pretty sure that the above would tend to wreck a hotel lobby and sub floors...

Tim wrote -- "It fell to the ground faster than the speed of gravity which proves the creation of a vacume below the building."

You know, if there just weren't so darn many video cameras rolling that day, you might have been able to slide that one by a few people. Do you know much about gravity? Well it's safe to say that on earth, gravity is a constant - yeah it doesn't change. It will accelerate a *free-falling* solid object at 9.8 meters per second squared. So the first second it falls 9.8 meters. the 2nd second it falls 19.6 meters and so on and so on. Now this is with a free-falling object. The towers weren't quite in free-fall, almost, but not quite. This explains why it took 2 to 3 seconds longer for the each of the towers to hit the ground than if they were at free-fall. 

Go ahead Tim, check out my math and watch the videos to see for yourself. You didn't before, so this time I want you to take a stopwatch and calculate just how long it takes. If you don't have a stopwatch, I would immediately go buy one. Because believe me, if I thought our government deliberately demolished the towers, I would be buying more than just a stopwatch!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Wrote &#8212; &#8220;How does a jet hit 80 floors up and cause total destruction to the sub-floors and lobby.&#8221;</p>
<p>Come on Tim, Buddy. Think about what you just said. Did you forget to mention that each building collapsed upon itself? 110 floors of heavy steal and concrete literally 500,000 tons falling straight down! I&#8217;m no expert on &#8220;total destruction&#8221; but, I&#8217;m pretty sure that the above would tend to wreck a hotel lobby and sub floors&#8230;</p>
<p>Tim wrote &#8212; &#8220;It fell to the ground faster than the speed of gravity which proves the creation of a vacume below the building.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know, if there just weren&#8217;t so darn many video cameras rolling that day, you might have been able to slide that one by a few people. Do you know much about gravity? Well it&#8217;s safe to say that on earth, gravity is a constant - yeah it doesn&#8217;t change. It will accelerate a *free-falling* solid object at 9.8 meters per second squared. So the first second it falls 9.8 meters. the 2nd second it falls 19.6 meters and so on and so on. Now this is with a free-falling object. The towers weren&#8217;t quite in free-fall, almost, but not quite. This explains why it took 2 to 3 seconds longer for the each of the towers to hit the ground than if they were at free-fall. </p>
<p>Go ahead Tim, check out my math and watch the videos to see for yourself. You didn&#8217;t before, so this time I want you to take a stopwatch and calculate just how long it takes. If you don&#8217;t have a stopwatch, I would immediately go buy one. Because believe me, if I thought our government deliberately demolished the towers, I would be buying more than just a stopwatch!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-3672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-3672</guid>
		<description>Hey Tim. ummmm where do you get these facts you speak of? maybe you should do some research buddy and by research i don't mean watching a film. maybe some reading? but of course anything that disproves what you believe must be written by the government. thats why you people are "conspiracy nuts" no matter what proof or fact you are giving it does not matter. if you really wanted to you could disprove all of your theory's just by doing a simple task like thinking. hmm what would happen if a jet carrying fuel and traveling @ 500+ mph hit a building? because i for one don't know but i can assume some things. like you will hear explosions after the initial hit. do you understand the amount of gas lines, and power boxes that building has? last time i check those things do explode. now i didn't read that i just thought about it. it makes sense. another thing even after watching the videos where the hell do you people get the idea that it was a controlled explosion? even having no background in the field i do understand that it takes a long time to prep a building for demolitions. and those explosions "squibs" umm how about pressure from that giant part of a building falling down on itself? possible? no? just a thought. try thinking more. if anyone is brain washed its yourself you don't think for yourself you follow what people who are "outside the box" are doing because you want to belong to something because you lack passion of your own. its the same mentality i had in high school why i always felt i needed to be different. but eventually you grow up and become your own person and think for yourself. but if you are right i'm glad you people are way smarter than the rest of the population, structural engineers, fire scientists, firemen, and most experts. good job on figuring it all out before everyone else. last time i checked our president isn't capable of forming complete sentences nor can him nor his friends keep scandals out of the spot light how the hell did they hide all of this? again think freaking think.  sorry i kinda went off a bit but this whole thing angers me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tim. ummmm where do you get these facts you speak of? maybe you should do some research buddy and by research i don&#8217;t mean watching a film. maybe some reading? but of course anything that disproves what you believe must be written by the government. thats why you people are &#8220;conspiracy nuts&#8221; no matter what proof or fact you are giving it does not matter. if you really wanted to you could disprove all of your theory&#8217;s just by doing a simple task like thinking. hmm what would happen if a jet carrying fuel and traveling @ 500+ mph hit a building? because i for one don&#8217;t know but i can assume some things. like you will hear explosions after the initial hit. do you understand the amount of gas lines, and power boxes that building has? last time i check those things do explode. now i didn&#8217;t read that i just thought about it. it makes sense. another thing even after watching the videos where the hell do you people get the idea that it was a controlled explosion? even having no background in the field i do understand that it takes a long time to prep a building for demolitions. and those explosions &#8220;squibs&#8221; umm how about pressure from that giant part of a building falling down on itself? possible? no? just a thought. try thinking more. if anyone is brain washed its yourself you don&#8217;t think for yourself you follow what people who are &#8220;outside the box&#8221; are doing because you want to belong to something because you lack passion of your own. its the same mentality i had in high school why i always felt i needed to be different. but eventually you grow up and become your own person and think for yourself. but if you are right i&#8217;m glad you people are way smarter than the rest of the population, structural engineers, fire scientists, firemen, and most experts. good job on figuring it all out before everyone else. last time i checked our president isn&#8217;t capable of forming complete sentences nor can him nor his friends keep scandals out of the spot light how the hell did they hide all of this? again think freaking think.  sorry i kinda went off a bit but this whole thing angers me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-694</guid>
		<description>"Firemen heard explosions in the towers"

So explosions = bombs?

Recommended reading: http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Firemen heard explosions in the towers&#8221;</p>
<p>So explosions = bombs?</p>
<p>Recommended reading: <a href="http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>From: Tim
Date: 01/24/2007
Message: I am deeply sadened by the fact that many lost their lives on 9-11. This however does not and should not keep those interested in the truth from keeping quiet. The individual on this site ridiculing what they call "conspiracy nuts" should do a little reading and use a little common sense before catagorising those that believe 911 was an inside job as nuts. I say your nuts not to check out the facts. Thats right i said facts, not theories. Fact multiple fireman reported explosions going off within the towers. Fact the subfloors, below ground level and the lobby were covered in a fine dust and were blown to pieces when the first firefighters arrived. How does a jet hit 80 floors up and cause total destruction to the subfloors and lobby. Fact, the fires just before the trade centers imploded were burning out and were not near as hot as they were just after impact. The dark smoke and the people hanging out of the building prove that. Fact, never in the history of steel constructed buildings has one imploded because of damage made by an airliner or fire. Fact, WTC 7, not the twin towers, imploded inward upon itself around 4:30pm the afternoon of 9-11. It fell to the ground faster than the speed of gravity which proves the creation of a vacume below the building. This can only be caused by removing the oxygen, which can only be caused by controlled demolitions. Fact, the owner of WTC 7 Larry Silverstein admitted on PBS that they made the decision to pull building 7 and they watched it fall. The term pull means to implode by controlled demolitions. This type of operation takes weeks to prepare. How could this be done on 9-11 in just a matter of hours amongst all the caos. I could go on and on. Someone needs to answer for these most pertinent questions. see 911research.com for more info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From: Tim<br />
Date: 01/24/2007<br />
Message: I am deeply sadened by the fact that many lost their lives on 9-11. This however does not and should not keep those interested in the truth from keeping quiet. The individual on this site ridiculing what they call &#8220;conspiracy nuts&#8221; should do a little reading and use a little common sense before catagorising those that believe 911 was an inside job as nuts. I say your nuts not to check out the facts. Thats right i said facts, not theories. Fact multiple fireman reported explosions going off within the towers. Fact the subfloors, below ground level and the lobby were covered in a fine dust and were blown to pieces when the first firefighters arrived. How does a jet hit 80 floors up and cause total destruction to the subfloors and lobby. Fact, the fires just before the trade centers imploded were burning out and were not near as hot as they were just after impact. The dark smoke and the people hanging out of the building prove that. Fact, never in the history of steel constructed buildings has one imploded because of damage made by an airliner or fire. Fact, WTC 7, not the twin towers, imploded inward upon itself around 4:30pm the afternoon of 9-11. It fell to the ground faster than the speed of gravity which proves the creation of a vacume below the building. This can only be caused by removing the oxygen, which can only be caused by controlled demolitions. Fact, the owner of WTC 7 Larry Silverstein admitted on PBS that they made the decision to pull building 7 and they watched it fall. The term pull means to implode by controlled demolitions. This type of operation takes weeks to prepare. How could this be done on 9-11 in just a matter of hours amongst all the caos. I could go on and on. Someone needs to answer for these most pertinent questions. see 911research.com for more info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debunk911</title>
		<link>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>debunk911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.debunk911myths.org/2006/09/fbi-releases-citgo-security-video/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>See my post above.  The white objects going by at 1:21-1:30 are intriguing, but on further inpection I don't think they are anything significant.  Just trucks going by on the road.  I suppose that the clock was off by a few minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my post above.  The white objects going by at 1:21-1:30 are intriguing, but on further inpection I don&#8217;t think they are anything significant.  Just trucks going by on the road.  I suppose that the clock was off by a few minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
